STRIKERS REVEL, BUT CAN THE COUNTRY AFFORD THEIR HUGE PAY INCREASE OR THE RIPPLE EFFECTS OF THE STRIKE?
So some of the nation's dock workers are striking! Ships have moved, but operations have been impeded by the absence of so many people across the labour spectrum.
Since our dancing strikers were not around during several other notable strikes in other parts of the world, they are unaware of the profound impact each of those strikes had upon shipping operations thereafter. Indeed, some strikes changed shipping irrevocably.
When the chairman of British & Commonwealth heard only hours before the intended launching of Pendennis Castle in December 1957 that the Harland & Wolff shipyard workers were refusing to launch the ship because of a pay grievance, the angry Lord Rotherwick told the Harland & Wolff chairman that B&C would never again order ships from the Belfast yard. He stuck to his word and four subsequent orders for mailships - Windsor Castle, Transvaal Castle, Southampton Castle and Good Hope Castle - went to English or Scottish yards. Harland & Wolff was ignored when B&C ordered two Union-Castle reefer ships, 29 Clan ships and other vessels.
Although P&O had already ordered Canberra from Harland & Wolff at the time of the Pendennis Castle debacle, and Royal Mail had ordered three medium-sized passengerships, Canberra was the last major Belfast-built passengership. Today, the former great shipyard gets sporadic - and subsidised - orders for warships, vessels associated with the offshore oil industry and has repair facilities.
Some believe that the subsequent unemployment in Belfast contributed to the sectarian violence of the 1960s and 1970s.
In the early 1970s, I wandered along Clydeside with the daughter of the late owner of a once-prominent shipbuilding company. Lest you wonder at this ramble, I hasten to add that she was a delightful lady of 70 summers, and my dear wife rambled along as well.
"What ship is that?" I enquired as we approached a half-built vessel on one of the large slipways. "An Israeli tanker," she replied in her Scottish lilt. "The yard went on strike a while ago, and when the contracted date passed, the Israelis told them to keep their tanker, and ordered one from Japan instead."
As British shipowners turned to European and Asian shipyards where prices were lower and, in the absence of strikes, delivery dates were usually honoured, many of the famous yards along those British estuaries fell silent, the gates closed, and the workforce headed for the dole.
A major catalyst for change in British shipping was the seamen's strike that began in May 1966. As British-registered ships returned to UK ports, crews walked off over grievances about pay and working hours. Photographs of the time showed dozens of great liners and freighters idle in British ports - Good Hope Castle, Reina del Mar and Edinburgh Castle lay triple-banked in Southampton.
The ensuing disruption of trade aggravated the already weak British balance of payments that, in turn, led to a run on sterling, and nearly toppled Harold Wilson's government.
The unions cared little about the disruption to the travel plans of thousands of people, and, as air travel was gaining popularity, the strike tipped many ardent ocean travelers towards the airlines much earlier than might have been the case had the strike not have happened.
The seamen got their increased wages, saddling shipowners with higher portage bills. Passenger fares and freight rates escalated, and the strike - coupled to other tumultuous changes in the shipping world such as containerisation, fuel price hikes and automated enginerooms - altered the face of shipping.
To reduce their wage bill, several owners opted for Asian crews and moved their ships to flags of convenience. This effectively reduced the number of jobs available for British seafarers, and began a general decline in British shipping. As passenger fares rose, airlines quickly captured the market, and even this ship-junkie chose to fly to Europe rather than travel in Edinburgh Castle on her last northbound voyage. The fare for a passage in an inner two-berth cabin was higher than what the airlines were offering at the time.
These ventures into recent history carry an important message. The dancing strikers may get their 15 percent increase which in the eyes of many, is exorbitant in an adverse financial climate, but the groundswell generated by their actions could wash up further than they anticipate, not least in greatly increased port and rail tariffs.
Already many exporters in the north-east have turned to Maputo as the outlet for their citrus and minerals cargoes, and even for vehicles, an escalating trend that could dent cargo volumes at some South African ports, with possible job losses.
Facing substantial losses, shipping lines are weighing up their options as vessels are delayed, and cargoes (especially time-sensitive fruit, vehicle parts, and other just-in-time cargoes) cannot be delivered timeously. Ultimately, we shall all pay for this strike as shipping surcharges will be imposed.
When these new costs are added to the proposed 300 percent increase in the levy imposed on ships calling at our ports by the South African Maritime Safety Authority, local ports will not be attractive to bunker ships or to owners who are comparing the cost of maintenance work on their vessels in South African ports with ports elsewhere.
Every ship that goes elsewhere represents a significant loss of potential earnings to repair companies, bunker suppliers, chandlers and to the ports themselves - with the possibility of job cutbacks.
By ignoring the broader picture and shipping history, our dancing strikers may have shot themselves in both feet. And the economy bleeds.